Go Back More Articles
Why Wait for Cancer Change Now
Products
Catalog
A Cancer Diagnosis Can Spark
a Cascade of Health-Related Lifestyle Changes In Diet, Exercise and Supplement
Use
More than 65 percent of adult cancer patients in western Washington report making one or more health-related
lifestyle change in response to their cancer diagnosis, according to a Fred
Hutchinson Cancer Research Center survey published in the March issue of the
Journal of the American Dietetic Association.
Almost all of the patients overwhelmingly feel that such changes --
whether a healthier diet or increased exercise or dietary-supplement use -- improve
their health and well-being.
This survey of more than 350 cancer patients in Washington is the
first population-based study of its kind to look at changes in
health-related behaviors up to two years following cancer diagnosis.
Ruth E. Patterson, Ph.D., R.D., and colleagues in Fred Hutchinson's
Public Health Sciences Division led the study, which was supported by grants
from the National Cancer Institute and funds from Fred Hutchinson.
Researchers at Bastyr University in Kenmore, Wash., and Kaiser-Permanente in
Oakland, Calif., also consulted on the project.
Patients were asked if they had made any major changes in diet,
physical activity or supplement use to cope with cancer or reduce the risk
of cancer returning or spreading. Psychological factors that might influence
such changes, such as perceived health status and desire for personal
control, also were assessed via questionnaire.
Overall, the researchers found lifestyle changes
were very common after a cancer diagnosis. Fifty percent of those
surveyed started taking new dietary supplements (most common were
multivitamins and/or vitamin E), 40 percent made dietary changes (most
common was eating more fruits and vegetables), and 20 percent started a new
physical activity (most commonly aerobic exercise). Two-thirds of patients
reported making at least one such behavior change in the previous year, a
quarter of those surveyed reported making two changes, and nearly 10 percent
made improvements in all three areas.
"The vast majority of patients reported
that these lifestyle changes improved their health and well-being,"
said Patterson, a member of Fred Hutchinson's Public Health Sciences
Division and a research associate professor at the University of Washington
School of Public Health and Community Medicine. Most of these changes were
healthful and consistent with national cancer-prevention guidelines, such as
eating more fruits and vegetables and less fat. Other changes, such as
supplementation with vitamin C, garlic or echinacea, were more
controversial.
"Because of the possibility of negative drug-herb interactions,
as well as the possibility that supplement use could interfere with
chemotherapy, health-care providers need to be aware that supplement use is
common among cancer patients," Patterson said. "Anyone who is in
active cancer treatment should talk to their medical team about the use of
vitamins and supplements, which may need to be curtailed during
treatment," she said.
Age, gender and treatment history affected the trend toward lifestyle
change. For example, older patients (those over 60) were about half as
likely to make dietary changes after a cancer diagnosis, female patients
were twice as likely to take new dietary supplements, and those undergoing
multiple treatments (radiation therapy, surgery and/or chemotherapy) were
two to three times more likely to make changes in diet or physical activity.
More educated patients also were more likely to make dietary changes and
take new supplements.
Psychological factors associated with health-related behaviors
included a strong desire for personal control and a conviction that one's
health is largely within one's control. In contrast, a person's perceived
health status -- whether they thought themselves to be in excellent or poor
condition -- did not significantly impact lifestyle change.
The study findings suggest several key messages for health-care
practitioners.
"These data suggest that cancer survivors are highly motivated to
attempt lifestyle changes in diet, physical activity and dietary-supplement
use as much as two years after diagnosis," Patterson said.
"However, little is known about how lifestyle behaviors affect cancer
recurrence and prognosis.
"Nonetheless, family, friends, media and personnel at health-food
stores may readily give advice, much of which is offered with a degree of
certainty that is out of proportion with available scientific evidence.
Therefore, studies are needed that test hypotheses about changing health
behavior to improve survival rates after a cancer diagnosis."
"Cancer survivors are motivated to make
positive changes yet are vulnerable to nutrition misinformation,"
said David Grotto, a registered dietitian and spokesman for the American
Dietetic Association. "Registered dietitians are uniquely qualified to
guide cancer patients and survivors in adopting science-based, healthy
dietary choices and lifestyle strategies."
The survey was based on telephone interviews with 356 adults who had
been diagnosed with breast, prostate or colon cancer between February 1997
and December 1998. The group was divided equally among men and women, with
equal representation among the three types of cancer. The participants were
located through Fred Hutchinson's Cancer Surveillance System, a
population-based registry of cancer incidence in western Washington that is
part of a nationwide cancer registry funded by the National Cancer
Institute.
One limitation to the study, Patterson noted, is that the survey was
limited to patients with breast, prostate and colorectal cancer who were
interviewed up to two years after diagnosis. Because survival rates for
these cancers are high, motivations for making lifestyle changes among these
patients may be different from those of patients with malignancies that have
a poor prognosis, such as lung or pancreatic cancers.
In addition, the study population reflects western Washington
demographics, which is predominantly white. Additional studies are needed to
assess lifestyle changes among cancer patients in other racial/ethnic
groups.
"The results of these analyses indicate that cancer patients are
often making lifestyle changes months to years after diagnosis and represent
a group of adults who could benefit from counseling on diet and physical
activity," Patterson said. "Health-care providers who work with
cancer survivors need to be wary of dismissing or discounting dietary
supplements or other nutritional or exercise regimens given that patients
overwhelmingly feel that these activities improve their health and
well-being."
CONTACT: Kristen Lidke Woodward of Fred Hutchinson,
Bridget McManamon of American Dietetic Association,.
Source: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
|